Trump Fights Back: Tariffs Under Fire in Federal Court

The Trump administration is pushing back against court rulings that question the legality of sweeping tariffs. These decisions have emerged from lawsuits brought by companies directly affected by the trade measures.

Two toy companies initiated a lawsuit that resulted in a federal judge declaring the president lacked authority. The judge concluded Trump could not unilaterally impose tariffs designed to reshape global economic systems.

Judge Rudolph Contreras agreed with the Court of International Trade's ruling but limited his order to the plaintiffs. He ruled the tariffs could not be enforced against the two toy companies who brought the legal challenge.

In response, a federal appeals court temporarily delayed the broader Court of International Trade's earlier decision. The Trump administration views these delays as critical to maintaining their trade negotiation strategy.

The Justice Department claims the district court's order undermines the president during sensitive global negotiations. Their Monday filing argued the tariffs must remain a credible threat to retain leverage with foreign partners.

Additionally, DOJ lawyers assert Judge Contreras lacks jurisdiction to intervene, stating such disputes belong in trade court. The administration warns the ruling disrupts efforts to recalibrate America’s trading relationships worldwide.